For high quality, hypothesis driven diabetes research projects, lasting up to five years and costing less than £500,000.
The Principle Investigator will usually have a tenured post or be able to demonstrate that they will have a salary for the lifetime of the grant.
The research must take place at an established research institution in the UK.
Up to five years.
Staff salaries. For example: technician, research assistant, postdoctoral researcher. This excludes support for PhD students, who are not eligible to work on a project grant.
Research consumables directly attributable to the project.
Research equipment essential for the project. While there is no upper limit on this amount, host institutions are encouraged to contribute towards the cost of requested equipment. A contribution will be expected when applicants plan to use the equipment across multiple projects and departments at their institute, rather than solely on this project. We would expect the contribution to be proportionate to the total amount requested.
Clinical and secretarial assistance may be provided in some cases, if essential, but this must be fully justified within the application.
Applicants applying for £500,000 or more must contact Diabetes UK in the first instance and should already hold substantial funding from Diabetes UK or another funding body. Please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org to discuss further.
Early-career basic scientists and clinical lecturers should consider applying for an Early-Career Small Grant. Please check your eligibility for either scheme before applying.
1 June (Committee meets in October)
1 December (Committee meets in May/June)
How to apply
Read the general guidelines for grant applicants and tips for writing a grant application.
Log on to the Diabetes UK online grants management system.
Complete all sections of the online application form, using the grants management system user guide.
All applications will be sent out for external peer review.
Applicants will be given the opportunity to rebut peer reviewer comments. The anonymised peer reviews will be sent out via the Diabetes UK online grant management system, which allows applicants to submit their response (1,500 word limit).The date applicants will be contacted for rebuttal will depend on the grant round, but as a guidance:
December application deadline: March (May Committee)
June application deadline: August (October Committee)
Due to the high number of applications received by Diabetes UK, it is not possible to take forward all applications to the Research Committee for discussion. Therefore, following external peer review and rebuttal, applications undergo a pre-selection process, ratified by the Chair of the Research Committee and Committee members designated to speak to that application.
Applications that have not progressed through the pre-selection stage will be informed of the outcome before the Research Committee Meeting. Individual feedback is not provided for these applications.
Grants Advisory Panel and Research Committee
Prior to the Research Committee meeting, the Diabetes UK Grants Advisory Panel (GAP) will discuss all grant applications. GAP is comprised of people living with and affected by diabetes, who use the lay summary of each grant application to establish how relevant the research is to people living with diabetes. Several GAP members attend Research Committee to provide feedback.
The GAP perspective can directly influence the funding decision made. We recommend applicants take this into consideration, making sure that the summary for people living with diabetes is written in plain English.
Our Research Funding Process and Review Panels page provides more insight into the Research Committee and lay review process.
Applications are assessed on the following criteria:
Potential difference the research will make to the lives of people with diabetes.
Track record of the applicants.
Value for money.
Feedback letters will be sent to all lead applicants within one month of the Research Committee meeting.
Funded applicants will have two weeks to respond to comments raised by the Committee.
Funded applicants should expect to receive an award letter within two months of the Research Committee meeting.